netdev - Re: [PATCH] macvtap: Fix macvtap_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 Nov 2011 01:35:52 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	krkumar2@...ibm.com
Cc:	jasowang@...hat.com, arnd@...db.de, levinsasha928@...il.com,
	mst@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] macvtap: Fix macvtap_get_queue to use rxhash first

From: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 09:39:11 +0530

> Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM:
>>
>> My description is not clear again :(
>> I mean the same vhost thead:
>>
>> vhost thread #0 transmits packets of flow A on processor M
>> ...
>> vhost thread #0 move to another process N and start to transmit packets
>> of flow A
> 
> Thanks for clarifying. Yes, binding vhosts to CPU's
> makes the incoming packet go to the same vhost each
> time. BTW, are you doing any binding and/or irqbalance
> when you run your tests? I am not running either at
> this time, but thought both might be useful.

So are we going with this patch or are we saying that vhost binding
is a requirement?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html