lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 13:00:20 -0500 From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca> To: Justin Pettit <jpettit@...ira.com> Cc: Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>, dev@...nvswitch.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH net-next 4/4] net: Add Open vSwitch kernel components. On Sat, 2011-11-26 at 23:17 -0800, Justin Pettit wrote: > > You're right--calling tc directly through system() is kind of ugly. > That code was written a *long* time ago when we wanted a quick QoS story. > As you mentioned, we use netlink to configure traffic shaping, so we have > all the pieces at this point. I just think no one ever bothered to clean > up that little wart in userspace. Understandable. You shipped something that works. I guess the point i was trying to make is you _are_ already using the classifier action subsystem. You have the u32 classifier and the policer action. You should just introduce a new classifier and the 2 or so actions you need and other folks can benefit from them as well without need to use openvswitch. > We encourage users to use shaping, since it generally provides > better results (and we do expose per-flow granularity there). > As a result, we haven't seen a need to improve support for policing. HTB's metering algorithm was essentially originally ripped off the policer action; probably better off for TCP to use shaping hence the results you are observing. cheers, jamal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists