lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:03:27 -0000
From:	"David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:	"Wolfgang Grandegger" <wg@...ndegger.com>,
	"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
	<socketcan-users@...ts.berlios.de>, "IreneV" <boir1@...dex.ru>,
	"Stanislav Yelenskiy" <stanislavelensky@...oo.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] can: cc770: add legacy ISA bus driver for the CC770 and AN82527

 
...
> >> +	for (idx = 0; idx < MAXDEV; idx++) {
> > ARRAY_SIZE?
> 
> Well, I think ARRAY_SIZE is useful to derive the number of 
> elements from a static array of the type:
> 
>   static const int array[] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, }
> 
> but not if its declared as:
> 
>   static array[MAXDEV]:
> 
> ... or have I missed something?

Yes - if you use ARRAY_SIZE() then someone reading the code
doesn't need to find the array definition to ensure the loop
upper bound is correct.

	David


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ