netdev - Re: RAW netfilter - "advanced netfilter setting" or not?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 1 Dec 2011 19:12:48 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	richard.weinberger@...il.com, pablo@...filter.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, kaber@...sh.net,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAW netfilter - "advanced netfilter setting" or not?

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:07 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>>
>> So we'd need to unhide both raw and notrack, methinks.
>
> I just tossed the following into my tree:

I found a new one: Fedora 16 needs NF_CONNTRACK_NETBIOS_NS (and thus
NF_CONNTRACK_BROADCAST) for firewalld to work correctly - otherwise it
fails when you try to find network printers.

Yeah, it used to be enough to just use a regular firewall setting that
let IPP through, but that was before firewalld "knew" that you need to
also open up the samba port and netbios.

Oh well.

So can you remove the "depends on NETFILTER_ADVANCED" from
NF_CONNTRACK_NETBIOS_NS too?

Or should I just do it?

                        Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html