| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 15:00:13 -0800 From: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: rick.jones2@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] remove an outdated reference to T/TCP On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:42 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote: > > From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com> > Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:39:23 -0800 > > > On 12/06/2011 12:19 PM, David Miller wrote: > >> From: Rick Jones<rick.jones2@...com> > >> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 12:00:05 -0800 (PST) > >> > >>> > >>> Remove a particularly out of date bit of comment referring to T/TCP. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Rick Jones<rick.jones2@...com> > >> > >> I think it should stay because it discusses the potential bad side > >> effects of queueing any data that might be in the SYN. > > > > How about just the sentence that mentioned T/TCP explicitly since > > T/TCP is most definitely no longer starting to be used?-) The rest of > > it can be discussed when/if TCP Fast Open arrives :) > > T/TCP gives the statement context, as in referencing something that > might make us want to at least theoretically consider handling the > data. I am fine keeping the comment as is. This does remind me to put more comments on this part of the code in our upcoming Fast Open patch :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists