[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 02:16:20 -0500
From: Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
To: Masayuki Ohtake <masa-korg@....okisemi.com>,
Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya-linux@....okisemi.com>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
Cc: linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] pch_can: fix error passive level test
The test (((errc & PCH_REC) >> 8) > 127) would always be false because
the receive error counter ((errc & PCH_REC) >> 8) is at most 127, where
PCH_REC is defined as 0x7f00. To test whether the receive error counter
has reached the error passive level, the RP bit (15) should be used.
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
---
drivers/net/can/pch_can.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c b/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c
index d11fbb2..6edc25e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/pch_can.c
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@
#define PCH_IF_CREQ_BUSY BIT(15)
#define PCH_STATUS_INT 0x8000
+#define PCH_RP 0x00008000
#define PCH_REC 0x00007f00
#define PCH_TEC 0x000000ff
@@ -527,7 +528,7 @@ static void pch_can_error(struct net_device *ndev, u32 status)
priv->can.can_stats.error_passive++;
state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE;
cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_CRTL;
- if (((errc & PCH_REC) >> 8) > 127)
+ if (errc & PCH_RP)
cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_PASSIVE;
if ((errc & PCH_TEC) > 127)
cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_PASSIVE;
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists