lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 06:43:13 +0100 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: Simon Chen <simonchennj@...il.com> Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>, Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: under-performing bonded interfaces Le mercredi 21 décembre 2011 à 20:26 -0500, Simon Chen a écrit : > Hi folks, > > I added an Intel X520 card to both the sender and receiver... Now I > have two 10G ports on a PCIe 2.0 x8 slot (5Gx8), so the bandwidth of > the PCI bus shouldn't be the bottleneck. > > Now the throughput test gives me around 16Gbps in aggregate. Any ideas > how I can push closer to 20G? I don't quite understand where the > bottleneck is now. Could you post some "perf top" or "perf record / report" numbers ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists