netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 05 Jan 2012 21:19:08 +0800
From:	Shan Wei <shanwei88@...il.com>
To:	john.haxby@...cle.com
CC:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	prarit@...hat.com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] netfilter: xtables: inclusion of xt_SYSRQ

Patrick McHardy wrote, at 2010/4/21 20:59:

> I really think this is pushing what netfilter is meant for a bit
> far. Its basically abusing the firewall ruleset to offer a network
> service.
> 
> I can see that its useful to have this in the kernel instead of
> userspace, but why isn't this implemented as a stand-alone module?
> That seems like a better design to me and also makes it more useful
> by not depending on netfilter.


It's very useful to remotely sysrq server machines in large data-center.
Another solution by Prarit Bhargava is denied by David Miller,
see discussion http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/101284/.

xt_SYSRQ solution is more convenience for us to use in inner system.
I hope this solution can be merged to main tree. :-)
But before that, this code need to be fixed (may be need more hashing enhancement).

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
>> ---
>> +module_param_string(password, sysrq_password, sizeof(sysrq_password),
>> +	S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR);
>> +module_param_string(hash, sysrq_hash, sizeof(sysrq_hash), S_IRUSR);

Read only.
hash algorithm can be changed.

>> +module_param_named(seqno, sysrq_seqno, long, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR);

sysrq_seqno is set using current time in sysrq_crypto_init.
Whatever we set, sysrq_seqno is not equal to what we set.

>> +	if (len == 0)
>> +		return NF_DROP;

malformed packet should be delivered to udp protocol handing.
 


>> +	if (i != 3) {
>> +		if (sysrq_debug)
>> +			pr_info("badly formatted request\n");
>> +		return NF_DROP;

Is there 1% possibility for user to send x,x,x,x, type data in udp payload?

>> +	do_gettimeofday(&now);
>> +	sysrq_seqno = now.tv_sec;
>> +	ret = xt_register_targets(sysrq_tg_reg, ARRAY_SIZE(sysrq_tg_reg));

register target.

>> +static int __init sysrq_tg_init(void)
>> +{
>> +	if (sysrq_crypto_init() < 0)
>> +		pr_info("starting without crypto\n");
>> +	return xt_register_targets(sysrq_tg_reg, ARRAY_SIZE(sysrq_tg_reg));

register again. This will cause target list dead loop.

--
Best Regards
Shan Wei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html