netdev - Re: sha512: make it work, undo percpu message schedule

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Jan 2012 02:12:48 +0100
From:	Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger <ken@...elabs.ch>
To:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
CC:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sha512: make it work, undo percpu message schedule

On 01/11/2012 01:00 AM, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> commit f9e2bca6c22d75a289a349f869701214d63b5060
> aka "crypto: sha512 - Move message schedule W[80] to static percpu area"
> created global message schedule area.

[snip]

> I personally don't understand this changelog entry:
> 
> 	"The message schedule W (u64[80]) is too big for the stack."
> 
> Hash context is dynamically allocated.

My original patch did the same thing as yours and put the message
schedule on the stack in sha512_transform. Herbert argued [1], that it
was too big and suggested to store it in a static per-cpu area.

[1] - http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org/msg02527.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html