lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:03:53 +0100
From:	"Arend van Spriel" <arend@...adcom.com>
To:	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	"Larry Finger" <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
	"Alwin Beukers" <alwin@...adcom.com>,
	"Roland Vossen" <rvossen@...adcom.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	"Network Development" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@...adcom.com>,
	Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Subject: Re: brcm80211 breakage..

On 01/12/2012 08:13 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> The code in v3.2 also used to support srom rev < 4, the new code
>> doesn't seem to do that.
> 
> I ended up trying to bisect this, and seem to have been successful.
> The problem came in not with the BCMA use, but with commit
> 888153b3db3f ("brcm80211: smac: avoid sprom endianess conversions for
> crc8 check")

Thanks for doing that while I had put my head on a pillow.

> I haven't yet tried to revert this on top of the current tree, but I'm
> pretty sure about the bisection. That commit changes things to be read
> a byte at a time, but it *also* removes the old code that only read
> SROM_WORDS from the SROM.
> 
> Might the apple parts have different SROM contents? I assume "SROM" is
> just a serial rom, which may be external and contain things like the ?

Mostly configuration parameters for RF/PHY.

> All the BCMA changes make the revert somewhat non-trivial, could
> somebody who knows the code better please try to do it for me? It
> doesn't look complicated, and I can try to do it myself tomorrow if
> nobody else steps up, but I'd *really* prefer the guilty parties
> themselves to do it, ok?
> 
> Arend - it's your commit...

Ok. I know a hint when I see one ;-)

>                     Linus
> 

Gr. AvS

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ