netdev - Re: [patch v1, kernel version 3.2.1] Source mode for macvlan interaface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:08:45 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Štefan Gula <steweg@...t.sk>
Cc:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v1, kernel version 3.2.1] Source mode for macvlan
 interaface

Le lundi 23 janvier 2012 à 15:44 +0100, Štefan Gula a écrit :
> 2012/1/23 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>:

> >> +static void macvlan_hash_del_sources(struct macvlan_source_list *list,
> >> +                                     bool sync)
> >> +{
> >> +     hlist_del_rcu(&list->hlist);
> >> +     kfree_rcu(list, rcu);
> >> +     if (sync)
> >> +             synchronize_rcu();
> >> +}
> >> +
> >
> > Please explain why are you using synchronize_rcu() here, as there must
> > be a good reason, but I missed it.
> I though so, but I was not sure whether that should be removed or not
> so I rather leave it there as I followed the original code structure
> of macvlan driver. So should I remove it?

If you use kfree_rcu(), its a call_rcu() : A grace period will be
respected before the object freeing, so you dont need the
synchronize_rcu() at all.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html