netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/1] dsa: Add reporting of silicon revision for Marvell 88E6123/88E6161/88E6165 switches.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:35:32 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	<florian@...nwrt.org>, <cphealy@...il.com>, <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
	<buytenh@...tstofly.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dsa: Add reporting of silicon revision for Marvell
 88E6123/88E6161/88E6165 switches.

On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 13:59 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>
> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:48:10 +0100
> 
> > On 01/23/12 08:20, Chris Healy wrote:
> >> +		if ((ret&  0xfff0) == 0x1650)
> >>   			return "Marvell 88E6165";
> >>   	}
> > 
> > What about a switch/case here?
> 
> I don't think you can express "(ret&  0xfff0) == 0x1650)" using
> a switch statement.
> 
> But BTW, the formatting of that expression needs to be cleaned up.
> It should be "(ret & 0xfff0) == 0x1650)"

Florian's mailer has mangled the quoted text; the original patch had
correct spacing.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html