netdev - Re: [PATCH 4/6] netprio_cgroup: use IS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 1 Feb 2012 07:02:09 -0500
From:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] netprio_cgroup: use IS_ENABLED() and family

On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 03:22:59PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> >>> Do not mix genuine bug fixes and cleanups.
> >>>
> >>> Otherwise I cannot apply your bug fixes to the 'net' tree.
> >>>
> >>> Seperate things out, submit only pure bug fixes first, then
> >>> later once those changes propagate you can submit the cleanups.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I did seperate them out, so the first three patches are fixes,
> >> and others are cleanups. I can resend cleanup patches once
> >> fixes hit mainline.
> > 
> > Seperate them in different groups, don't submit them as one
> > collection.  And definitely don't submit them all at the
> > same damn time!  You have to wait with the dependent cleanups
> > until the fixes go in, and subsequently show up in my net-next
> > tree.
> > 
> > I'm not applying this stuff until you submit it properly, in
> > two stages.
> > 
> 
> I'll do this when I get some comments/acks.
> 

The changes look fine to me.
I'll ack them once you submit them properly.
Thanks
Neil

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html