netdev - Re: [net-next] ixgbe: Add module parameter to allow untested and unsafe SFP+ modules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:24:14 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Cc:	peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	gospo@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com, hawk@...x.dk
Subject: Re: [net-next] ixgbe: Add module parameter to allow untested and
 unsafe SFP+ modules

From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Date: Wed,  1 Feb 2012 11:19:21 -0800

> From: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
> 
> The X520 family of network devices, with the 82599 chip, support a
> small number of Intel-verified SFP+ modules on their NICs.  To maintain
> stability and quality, the current devices restrict untested 3rd party
> SFP+ modules.
> 
> This patch introduces a module parameter for ixgbe to allow these untested
> modules at the user's peril.  It also includes a warning to the syslog
> alerting users that the modules aren't supported, and results may
> vary.
> 
> CC: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...x.dk>
> Signed-off-by: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
> Tested-by: Phil Schmitt <phillip.j.schmitt@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>

Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html