lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 05 Feb 2012 11:12:10 -0800
From:	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] l2cap_chan_connect() shouldn't be inlined

Hi Al,

> For one thing, it's big.  For another, the only caller is in a different
> file anyway...
> 
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h b/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h
> index 68f5891..124f7cf 100644
> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h
> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/l2cap.h
> @@ -834,7 +834,7 @@ int l2cap_add_scid(struct l2cap_chan *chan,  __u16 scid);
>  struct l2cap_chan *l2cap_chan_create(struct sock *sk);
>  void l2cap_chan_close(struct l2cap_chan *chan, int reason);
>  void l2cap_chan_destroy(struct l2cap_chan *chan);
> -inline int l2cap_chan_connect(struct l2cap_chan *chan, __le16 psm, u16 cid,
> +int l2cap_chan_connect(struct l2cap_chan *chan, __le16 psm, u16 cid,
>  								bdaddr_t *dst);

I have no idea on how that happened, but you are fully correct this is
pointless.

Acked-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>

Regards

Marcel


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists