netdev - RE: [patch] bna: fix error handling of bnad_get_flash_partition_by

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 9 Feb 2012 17:53:20 -0800
From:	Rasesh Mody <rmody@...cade.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Adapter Linux Open SRC Team" 
	<adapter_linux_open_src_team@...cade.COM>
Subject: RE: [patch] bna: fix error handling of
 bnad_get_flash_partition_by_offset()

>From: Dan Carpenter [mailto:dan.carpenter@...cle.com]
>Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 2:50 AM
>
>The current error handling doesn't work because we flash_part is a u32
>so the checks for negative error codes don't work.  I considered making
>things signed but I don't know the hardware enough to say if that's a
>problem.  Really, we don't use the error codes so just returning zero
>for all problems is fine.

Hi Dan,

We can't return 0 from the bnad_get_flash_partition_by_offset() on error as the flash partition 0 is a optrom partition. Also we got comments to return proper Linux error codes as ethtool application expects so.

What we can do is change the return type of the bnad_get_flash_partition_by_offset() to int.

Thanks,
Rasesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html