netdev - Re: [PATCH v7 4/8] seccomp: Add SECCOMP_RET

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:33:09 +0400
From:	Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linun-security-module@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/8] seccomp: Add SECCOMP_RET_TRAP

On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 12:19 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 00:03 +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 13:30 -0600, Will Drewry wrote:
> > > (As a side note, I realize the CC list has ballooned.  In the next
> > > rev, I'll pare it down to active participants and the appropriate
> > > lists and not just the get_maintainers.pl output!)
> > Add kernel-hardening to CC and remove me and Kees ;)
> 
> Should that list be added to MAINTAINERS or
> Documentation/ somewhere?

Probably yes, but we haven't fully agreed on what are the formal
criterias of k-h posting.  Currently these are either discussion of
not-yet-merged security features or general security problems of Linux.
I guess we should more clearly state the role of k-h to place k-h in
MAINTAINERS.

Thanks,

-- 
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html