lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 8 Mar 2012 09:49:06 -0800
From:	<Parav.Pandit@...lex.Com>
To:	<David.Laight@...LAB.COM>, <romieu@...zoreil.com>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC 2/2] be2net: Added functionality to support RoCE driver


________________________________________
From: David Laight [David.Laight@...LAB.COM]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 7:08 PM
To: Pandit, Parav; romieu@...zoreil.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [RFC 2/2] be2net: Added functionality to support RoCE driver

> > > + void *ocrdma_dev;
>
> > > Is there a reason why it could not be 'struct ocrdma_dev *o' ?
> [Parav] Yes. Reason is NIC driver publishes interface to RoCE
> driver. NIC driver is not aware of ocrdma_dev structure.
> So its void pointer.

If the argument can only ever be 'struct ocrdma_dev *'
then used the named structure pointer - you don't need to
expose the actual definition to the other drivers.

Makes it much more difficult to pass the address of an
inappropriate structure.
[Parav] If I understand correctly, I should do following.

Instead of void* in add(), remove(), event_handler(), 
it should be struct ocrdma_dev* with forward declaration.

Is that correct understanding?

        David


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists