| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:45:40 -0600 From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> To: Thomas Lendacky <tahm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> CC: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] NUMA aware scheduling per cpu vhost thread On 3/23/12 12:32 PM, Thomas Lendacky wrote: > Quick description of the tests: > TCP_RR and UDP_RR using 256 byte request/response size in 1, 10, 30 > and 60 instances > TCP_STREAM and TCP_MAERTS using 256, 1K, 4K and 16K message sizes > and 1 and 4 instances > > Remote host to VM using 1, 4, 12 and 24 VMs (2 vCPUs) with the tests > running between an external host and each VM. > > Local VM to VM using 2, 4, 12 and 24 VMs (2 vCPUs) with the tests > running between VM pairs on the same host (no TCP_MAERTS done in > this situation). > > For TCP_RR and UDP_RR tests I report the transaction rate as the > score and the transaction rate / KVMhost CPU% as the efficiency. > > For TCP_STREAM and TCP_MAERTS tests I report the throughput in Mbps > as the score and the throughput / KVMhost CPU% as the efficiency. Would you mind sharing the netperf commands you are running and an example of the math done to arrive at the summaries presented? David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists