netdev - Re: suspicious RCU usage warnings in 3.3.0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:55:56 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	mroos@...ux.ee, shemminger@...tta.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: suspicious RCU usage warnings in 3.3.0

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 06:35:13 -0700

DANGER WILL ROBINSON, McKenney is hacking sparc64 assembler!
:-))))

> My main concern about my patch is my removal of this line:
> 
> 	bne,pn			%icc, __handle_softirq
> 
> It is quite possible that this should instead change to look as follows:
> 
> 	bne,pn			%icc, __handle_preemption
> 

I would say it should not, because the __handle_softirq code path,
if taken, unconditionally branches to the very next instruction
after this branch and it's delay slot.

> Anyway, patch with updated changelog below.

Great work, I'll apply this after I test it out a bit myself.

Thanks a lot Paul!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html