netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] netfilter: ipvs: Verify that IP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:06:22 +0200
From:	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To:	Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
Cc:	wensong@...ux-vs.org, horms@...ge.net.au, kaber@...sh.net,
	davem@...emloft.net, davej@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] netfilter: ipvs: Verify that IP_VS protocol has
 been registered

On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg> wrote:
>        Ops. It seems now we expose old problem when
> no protocol is configured. As this change probably will
> go to stable kernels, lets make it correct. Can you
> remove the defines around register_ip_vs_proto_netns, so
> that it is always compiled. One that wants to save
> memory will not disable all protocols. See commit
> 091bb34c143674d37a59b2d4857534f7106c5d7d for reference.

Oh, so it wasn't getting built right now at all if we didn't select
any protocols.

How about moving those defines down to our loop as well? this way
everything will behave exactly like it did before.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html