netdev - Re: [RFC v4] Add TCP encap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 22 Apr 2012 17:06:58 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jhs@...atatu.com
Cc:	stephen.hemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	dev@...nvswitch.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, horms@...ge.net.au
Subject: Re: [RFC v4] Add TCP encap_rcv hook (repost)

From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 11:54:42 -0400

> On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 08:22 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> 
>> Therefore Simon's
>> proposed hook is the only way to support it. But exposing that
>> hook does allow for other misuse.
> 
> If you object to this, then you gotta object to the UDP equivalent 
> which has been around for sometime now for legitimate reasons
> and could be used by STT (I think the claim was no hardware
> does USO);->

I don't think so, for the UDP case it's much different.  All the
necessary "protocol" work has been performed on the packet by the time
the encap handler runs for UDP.

I'm not saying I still object to this TCP thing, however.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html