netdev - Re: [PATCH v3] bonding: don't increase rx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 04 May 2012 10:53:00 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jbohac@...e.cz
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, fubar@...ibm.com, andy@...yhouse.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] bonding: don't increase rx_dropped after processing
 LACPDUs

From: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 15:28:24 +0200

> On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 03:04:56PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 14:19 +0200, Jiri Bohac wrote:
>> >  		if (likely(nskb)) {
>> > -			recv_probe(nskb, bond, slave);
>> > +			ret = recv_probe(nskb, bond, slave);
>> >  			dev_kfree_skb(nskb);
>> > +			if (ret == RX_HANDLER_CONSUMED) {
>> > +				kfree_skb(skb);
>> 
>> consume_skb(skb) to not fool drop_monitor/dropwatch ?
> 
> Thanks, fixed below:

You're doing the patch-as-reply thing again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html