| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 00:24:31 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Stable regression with 'tcp: allow splice() to build full TSO packets'
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:22:31AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 00:16 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:01:59AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 23:50 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 23:40 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I dont understand why we should tcp_push() if we sent 0 bytes in this
> > > > > splice() call.
> > > > >
> > > > > The push() should have be done already by prior splice() call, dont you
> > > > > think ?
> > > > >
> > > > > out:
> > > > > if (copied && !(flags & MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST))
> > > > > tcp_push(sk, flags, mss_now, tp->nonagle);
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think I now understand
> > > >
> > > > One splice() syscall actually calls do_tcp_sendpages() several times
> > > > (N).
> > > >
> > > > Problem is N-1 calls are done with MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST set
> > > >
> > > > And last one with MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST unset
> > > >
> > > > So maybe we should replace this test by :
> > > >
> > > > if (!(flags & MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST))
> > > > tcp_push(...);
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Its more tricky than that.
> > >
> > > If we return 0 from do_tcp_sendpages(), __splice_from_pipe() wont call
> > > us again, but we need to flush(). (This bug is indeed very old)
> > >
> > > So maybe use :
> > >
> > > if ((copied && !(flags & MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST)) ||
> > > !copied)
> > > tcp_push(...);
> >
> > That's what I wanted to do at first but was still worried about the
> > situations where we fail upon first call due to lack of memory. And
> > indeed that did not fix the issue either :-(
> >
> > At least now I've checked that we fail here in do_tcp_sendpages() :
> >
> > if (!sk_stream_memory_free(sk)) {
> > printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s:%d copied=%d\n", __FUNCTION__, __LINE__, copied);
> > goto wait_for_sndbuf;
> > }
> >
> > Well, finally I just put the same test as yours above for the call to
> > tcp_push() upon out of memory and it fixed it too. I have simplified
> > the expression, since ((A && !B) || !A) == !(A & B).
> >
> > With the updated patch here it works for me. I don't know if it's
> > better.
> >
> > Willy
> >
> > -----
> >
> > From 1f26263bd4f8827bbca4cef77a99fac128cf8ccc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
> > Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 22:43:20 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] tcp: do_tcp_sendpages() must try to push data out on oom conditions
> >
> > Since recent changes on TCP splicing (starting with commits 2f533844
> > and 35f9c09f), I started seeing massive stalls when forwarding traffic
> > between two sockets using splice() when pipe buffers were larger than
> > socket buffers.
> >
> > Latest changes (net: netdev_alloc_skb() use build_skb()) made the
> > problem even more apparent.
> >
> > The reason seems to be that if do_tcp_sendpages() fails on out of memory
> > condition without being able to send at least one byte, tcp_push() is not
> > called and the buffers cannot be flushed.
> >
> > After applying the attached patch, I cannot reproduce the stalls at all
> > and the data rate it perfectly stable and steady under any condition
> > which previously caused the problem to be permanent.
> >
> > The issue seems to have been there since before the kernel migrated to
> > git, which makes me think that the stalls I occasionally experienced
> > with tux during stress-tests years ago were probably related to the
> > same issue.
> >
> > This issue was first encountered on 3.0.31 and 3.2.17, so please backport
> > to -stable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> > ---
> > net/ipv4/tcp.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> > index 63ddaee..cfe47c1 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> > @@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ new_segment:
> > wait_for_sndbuf:
> > set_bit(SOCK_NOSPACE, &sk->sk_socket->flags);
> > wait_for_memory:
> > - if (copied)
> > + if (!(copied && (flags & MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST)))
> > tcp_push(sk, flags & ~MSG_MORE, mss_now, TCP_NAGLE_PUSH);
> >
> > if ((err = sk_stream_wait_memory(sk, &timeo)) != 0)
> > @@ -927,7 +927,7 @@ wait_for_memory:
> > }
> >
> > out:
> > - if (copied && !(flags & MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST))
> > + if (!(copied && (flags & MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST)))
> > tcp_push(sk, flags, mss_now, tp->nonagle);
> > return copied;
> >
>
>
> Hmm... I believe I prefer your prior patch ( the one I Acked)
I too, less changes are better :-)
Thanks,
Willy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists