netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: added support for 40GbE link.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	bhutchings@...arflare.com
Cc:	parav.pandit@...lex.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: added support for 40GbE link.

From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:09:36 +0100

> On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 18:14 +0530, Parav Pandit wrote:
...
>> -/* The forced speed, 10Mb, 100Mb, gigabit, 2.5Gb, 10GbE. */
>> +/* The forced speed, 10Mb, 100Mb, gigabit, 2.5Gb, 10GbE, 40GbE. */
> 
> I don't think there's any need to name all possible link speeds, and it
> just encourages the bad practice of ethtool API users checking for
> specific values.  You may notice there is no SPEED_20000.

Agreed.

>> @@ -542,13 +542,11 @@ static int prb_calc_retire_blk_tmo(struct packet_sock *po,
 ...
> This function should be fixed properly.  Firstly, it must use
> ethtool_cmd_speed() rather than directly accessing ecmd.speed.
> Secondly, it should allow any speed value rather than checking for
> specific values.  Then there will be no need to make further changes for
> 100G or any other new speed.

Agreed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html