netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] tcp: avoid tx starvation by SYNACK packets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:	subramanian.vijay@...il.com, dave.taht@...il.com,
	hans.schillstrom@...csson.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	ncardwell@...gle.com, therbert@...gle.com, brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] tcp: avoid tx starvation by SYNACK packets

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 10:42:42 +0200

> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> 
> On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 00:34 -0700, Vijay Subramanian wrote:
> 
>> This  patch ([PATCH net-next] tcp: avoid tx starvation by SYNACK
>> packets)  is neither in net/net-next trees nor on patchwork. Maybe it
>> was missed since it was sent during the merge window. Is this not
>> needed anymore or is it being tested currently?
> 
> You're right, thanks for the reminder !
> 
> [PATCH v2 net-next] tcp: avoid tx starvation by SYNACK packets

I don't agree with this change.

What is the point in having real classification configuration if
arbitrary places in the network stack are going to override SKB
priority with a fixed priority setting?

I bet the person who set listening socket priority really meant it and
does not expect you to override it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html