netdev - Re: [PATCH v6] sctp: be more restrictive in transport selection on bundled sacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 1 Jul 2012 19:44:25 -0400
From:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, vyasevich@...il.com,
	linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] sctp: be more restrictive in transport selection on
 bundled sacks

On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 02:43:19PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 08:47:50 -0400
> 
> > Perhaps we could modify the SubmittingPatches document to indicate that an
> > Acked-by from a subsystem maintainer implicitly confers authority on the
> > upstream receiver to request reasonable stylistic changes that don't affect the
> > functionality of the patch in the interests of maintaining coding conventions.
> 
> Yes, that would make sense.
> 


I'll propose it in a few days.
Neil

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html