netdev - Re: [PATCH v6] sctp: be more restrictive in transport selection on bundled sacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:10:56 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	nhorman@...driver.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, vyasevich@...il.com,
	linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] sctp: be more restrictive in transport selection on
 bundled sacks

From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 08:25:31 -0400

> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 07:44:25PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 02:43:19PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> > From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
>> > Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 08:47:50 -0400
>> > 
>> > > Perhaps we could modify the SubmittingPatches document to indicate that an
>> > > Acked-by from a subsystem maintainer implicitly confers authority on the
>> > > upstream receiver to request reasonable stylistic changes that don't affect the
>> > > functionality of the patch in the interests of maintaining coding conventions.
>> > 
>> > Yes, that would make sense.
>> > 
>> 
>> 
>> I'll propose it in a few days.
>> Neil
>> 
> How does this language sound to you?

Looks fine to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html