netdev - Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00000000d8be176d

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 05 Jul 2012 23:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc:	wfg@...ux.intel.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	steffen.klassert@...unet.com
Subject: Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00000000d8be176d

From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 08:13:47 +0200

> @@ -975,7 +975,7 @@ static int ip6_dst_lookup_tail(struct sock *sk,
>  	 * dst entry of the nexthop router
>  	 */
>  	rcu_read_lock();
> -	rt = (struct rt6_info *) dst;
> +	rt = (struct rt6_info *) *dst;
>  	n = rt->n;
>  	if (n && !(n->nud_state & NUD_VALID)) {
>  		struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp;

This is obviously correct, please submit this formally.

Fengguang Wu can I ask you politely not to quote the quilty patch in
it's entirety when reporting bugs?  That screws up my workflow because
that patch goes then gets installed as a new patch in patchwork and I
have to therefore tick it off every time you report a bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html