netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v2] tcp: TCP Small Queues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:51:27 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	rick.jones2@...com, ycheng@...gle.com, dave.taht@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, codel@...ts.bufferbloat.net,
	therbert@...gle.com, mattmathis@...gle.com, nanditad@...gle.com,
	ncardwell@...gle.com, andrewmcgr@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] tcp: TCP Small Queues

On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 00:37 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:34:19 +0200
> 
> > On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 01:49 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > 
> >> The 10Gb receiver is a net-next kernel, but the 1Gb receiver is a 2.6.38
> >> ubuntu kernel. They probably have very different TCP behavior.
> > 
> > 
> > I tested TSQ on bnx2x and 10Gb links.
> > 
> > I get full rate even using 65536 bytes for
> > the /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_limit_output_bytes tunable
> 
> Great work Eric.

Thanks !

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html