lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 25 Jul 2012 17:22:19 +0800
From:	Xufeng Zhang <xufengzhang.main@...il.com>
To:	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Cc:	xufeng zhang <xufeng.zhang@...driver.com>, sri@...ibm.com,
	davem@...emloft.net, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: Make "Invalid Stream Identifier" ERROR follows SACK
 when bundling

On 7/25/12, Xufeng Zhang <xufengzhang.main@...il.com> wrote:
> On 7/25/12, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> Actually not true.  AUTH can be before SACK.  So can any addip chunks
>> that
>> aid in locating an association.
>>
>> Now AUTH isn't a big issue since its autogenerated to the packet but
>> ADDIP
>> is since it could be queued up for retransmission.
>>
>> There could be other extensions as well.  It really needs to be done
>> either
>> through side effects or making error chunks go at the end of other
>> control
>> chunks.  Need to audit the spec to see if that's ok.
> You are right, I just found SHUTDOWN chunks are also before SACK based on
> your commit "[SCTP]: Fix SACK sequence during shutdown".
> Maybe the only solution is to do some work on side effects just as you
> said.
> Thanks for your explanation!

And after take a moment to look into the relative codes, I think we
can implement it
by below way:
1). Add a flag(isi_err_needed) in the embedded struct peer of struct
struct sctp_association
just like sack_needed flag.
2). When "invalid stream identifier" ERROR happens in sctp_eat_data()
function, we just
set isi_err_needed flag and don't create ERROR chunk and also don't
insert SCTP_CMD_REPLY command.
3). In sctp_gen_sack() function, we create ERROR chunk and also insert
SCTP_CMD_REPLY command if isi_err_needed flag is set.

Is this way proper?


Thanks,
Xufeng Zhang
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Xufeng Zhang
>>
>> -vlad
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Xufeng Zhang
>>>>
>>>> -vlad
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent from my Android phone with SkitMail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ