netdev - Re: assert_cfg80211_lock warning with Linux v3.5-8833-g2d53492

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 1 Aug 2012 18:40:15 +0200
From:	"Arend van Spriel" <arend@...adcom.com>
To:	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
cc:	"Josh Boyer" <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
	"Johannes Berg" <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	"Brett Rudley" <brudley@...adcom.com>,
	"Roland Vossen" <rvossen@...adcom.com>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"Seth Forshee" <seth.forshee@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: assert_cfg80211_lock warning with Linux v3.5-8833-g2d53492

On 08/01/2012 05:52 PM, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 05:51:08PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>> On 08/01/2012 05:38 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>>> brcmsmac needs to hold cfg80211_mutex before calling freq_reg_info...
>>>>>
>>>>> It looks like those calls were added in mid-June.
>>>>>
>>> I think mid-june sounds about right. We never observed the warning when
>>> changes to use regulatory infrastructure were tested/reviewed. Should
>>> this precondition be mentioned in cfg80211.h?
>>>
>>> Gr. AvS
>>
>> Diving in further it seems brcmsmac can not grab the cfg80211_mutex. So
>> another solution is needed.
> 
> Do we need to revert those patches?
> 

either that or fix it.

Gr. AvS

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html