netdev - Re: [PATCH V2 09/12] net/eipoib: Add main driver functionality

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 03 Aug 2012 16:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ali@...lanox.com
Cc:	ebiederm@...ssion.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com, roland@...nel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, sean.hefty@...el.com, erezsh@...lanox.co.il
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 09/12] net/eipoib: Add main driver functionality

From: Ali Ayoub <ali@...lanox.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 15:39:36 -0700

> Users would like to use sockets API from the VM without re-writing their
> applications on top of IB verbs, this driver meant to allow such a user
> to do so.

That's what IPoIB was for, the application writers who don't want to have
to be knowledgable about IB verbs.

You're messing with the link layer here, and that's what is upsetting me.

It's a complete cop-out to changing the VM tools and emulators properly to
handle a new link layer.

The applications writers already have a way to use IB whilst using
something familiar, like IPv4, via IPoIB.  You're doing something
completely different here, and it stinks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html