netdev - Re: [PATCH V2 09/12] net/eipoib: Add main driver functionality

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:33:06 -0700
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Ali Ayoub <ali@...lanox.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, ogerlitz@...lanox.com,
	roland@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, sean.hefty@...el.com,
	erezsh@...lanox.co.il, dledford@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 09/12] net/eipoib: Add main driver functionality

ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:

> Ali Ayoub <ali@...lanox.com> writes:
>
>> Among other things, the main benefit we're targeting is to allow IPoE
>> traffic within the VM to go through the (Ethernet) vBridge down to the
>> eIPoIB PIF, and eventually to IPoIB and to the IB network.

Oh yes.  It just occurred to me there is huge problem with eIPoIB as
currently presented in these patches.  It breaks DHCPv4 the same way
it breaks ARP, but DHCPv4 is not fixed up.

I am stunned to to realize there has been so much push for a solution
that doesn't even support dhcp.

How can anyone possibly argue that eIPoIB works or is useful?  I just
can't imagine.

Totally stunned,
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html