netdev - Re: [PATCH][XFRM] Replace rwlock on xfrm_policy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:55:31 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	B32167@...escale.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][XFRM] Replace rwlock on xfrm_policy_afinfo with rcu

From: Jain Priyanka-B32167 <B32167@...escale.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 04:53:42 +0000

> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 4:52 AM
> To: Jain Priyanka-B32167
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][XFRM] Replace rwlock on xfrm_policy_afinfo with rcu
> 
> From: Priyanka Jain <Priyanka.Jain@...escale.com>
> Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 10:51:44 +0530
> 
>> xfrm_policy_afinfo is read mosly data structure.
>> Write on xfrm_policy_afinfo is done only at the time of configuration.
>> So rwlocks can be safely replaced with RCU.
>> 
>> RCUs usage optimizes the performance.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Priyanka Jain <Priyanka.Jain@...escale.com>
> 
> This patch doesn't apply to the net-next tree, please respin.
> [Priyanka]: I will send v2 after re-spinning against git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git.
> 
> Also:
> 
>> -			xfrm_policy_afinfo[afinfo->family] = NULL;
>> +			rcu_assign_pointer(xfrm_policy_afinfo[afinfo->family],
>> +				NULL);
> 
> Indent that NULL argument properly, it must line up with the first column after the openning '(' on the previous line.
> [Priyanka]: NULL has been pushed to next line to confirm to 80 characters per line rule. If I indent NULL to previous line, it will break 80 characters per line rule.
> Please let me know your final say on this. I will make changes accordingly if required.

What in the world are you talking about?

The openning parenthesis of the rcu_assign_pointer() statement is not anywhere
close to the 80th column.

You're doing this:

		x(A,
	B);

and I want you to do this:

		x(A,
		  B);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html