netdev - Re: [Question]About KVM network zero-copy feature!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 11 Aug 2012 13:55:56 -0700
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To:	"Peter Huang(Peng)" <peter.huangpeng@...wei.com>
Cc:	<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <avi@...hat.com>, <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	<mst@...hat.com>, <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Question]About KVM network zero-copy  feature!

On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:34:32 +0800
"Peter Huang(Peng)" <peter.huangpeng@...wei.com> wrote:

> Hi,All
> 
> I searched from git-log, and found that until now we have vhost TX zero-copy experiment feature, how
> about RX zero-copy?
> 
> For XEN, net-back also only has TX zero-copy, Is there any reason that RX zero-copy still not implemented?
> 
There is no guarantee that packet will ever be read by receiver. This means zero-copy could
create memory back pressure stalls.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html