netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86_64: Define 128-bit memory-mapped I/O operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:37:24 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
CC:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86_64: Define 128-bit memory-mapped I/O operations

On 08/21/2012 06:23 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Define reado(), writeo() and their raw counterparts using SSE.
> 
> Based on work by Stuart Hodgson <smhodgson@...arflare.com>.

It would be vastly better if we explicitly controlled this with
kernel_fpu_begin()/kernel_fpu_end() rather than hiding it in primitives
than might tempt the user to do very much the wrong thing.

Also, it needs to be extremely clear to the user that these operations
use the FPU, and all the requirements there need to be met, including
not using them at interrupt time.

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html