netdev - Re: [net-next 10/13] igb: Tidy up wrapping for CONFIG_IGB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:04:13 +0200
From:	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:	"Vick, Matthew" <matthew.vick@...el.com>
Cc:	"Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
	"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"gospo@...hat.com" <gospo@...hat.com>,
	"sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 10/13] igb: Tidy up wrapping for CONFIG_IGB_PTP.

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 06:40:25PM +0000, Vick, Matthew wrote:
> 
> I tend to agree with Jake here--I like having the information. I'm fine removing them, but I'd like to do it for all CONFIG_IGB_PTP wrapping if we're going to do it. What do you think, Richard?

I took a look at the #ifdefs in igb_main.c, and I would say they are
okay as is, except for the CONFIG_PM ones, which could use a comment
at the #endifs.

(a matter of taste, though)

Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html