netdev - Re: netlink scm creds uid and gids are always 0.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 24 Aug 2012 01:19:32 -0700
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: netlink scm creds uid and gids are always 0.

Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> writes:

> On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 23:45 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> While working on the kuid_t and kgid_t conversion of the audit subsystem
>> I noticed that since the performance problem of scm creds and af_unix
>> sockets were fixed af_netlink sockets have not filled in the uid or gid
>> of the originator of the socket.
>> 
>> I think all we need is an appropriate cred_to_ucred call to fix this
>> regression, but I am going so many different directions right now I
>> can't get myself to focus on this long enough to work up an appripriate
>> patch to fix.
>> 
>> Eric do you think you might take a gander?
>
> Wasnt it fixed by e0e3cea46d31d23dc40df0a49a7a2c04fe8edfea
>
> af_netlink: force credentials passing [CVE-2012-3520]
>
> Or is it a different thing ?

Same thing.  I didn't see that fix go by.

One more little thing I can cross off my list.  Hooray!

Eric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html