netdev - Re: [PATCH 00/19] netfilter: IPv6 NAT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 25 Aug 2012 03:16:58 +0200
From:	Andre Tomt <andre@...t.net>
To:	kaber@...sh.net
CC:	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] netfilter: IPv6 NAT

On 25. aug. 2012 02:58, Andre Tomt wrote:
> On 09. aug. 2012 22:08, kaber@...sh.net wrote:
>> The following patches contain an updated version of IPv6 NAT against
>> Linus' current tree.
>
> Hmmm. Looking in my crystal ball (hi #ipv6!), I predict that if this
> lands in mainline - and thus in consumer CPE/routers eventually - many
> ISP's will have little incentive to actually implement assigning of
> blocks to their consumer users like they "have to" today.
>
> We have this wonderful chance of fixing a major problem with todays
> internet, but now we are going down this very slippery slope.
>
> I do need this code for a experimental project myself, and acknowledge
> there may be some valid use cases, but I do not like the global
> implications one bit.
>
> At least some big fat warnings please?

Clarification: This is about the NAT66 port-based 1:n NAT targets.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html