netdev - Re: [iproute2][PATCH v2] tc: mirred target: do not report non-existing devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 4 Sep 2012 08:40:29 -0700
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To:	y@...hat.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Dan Kenigsberg <danken@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [iproute2][PATCH v2] tc: mirred target: do not report
 non-existing devices

On Sun,  2 Sep 2012 13:48:02 +0300
y@...hat.com wrote:

> From: Dan Kenigsberg <danken@...hat.com>
> 
> Currently, if a mirred target device is removed, `tc filter show`
> does not reveal the fact. Instead, it replaces the original name of the
> device with the default output of ll_map:ll_idx_n2a().
> 
> This is unfortunate, since one cannot differ between this case and a valid
> mirroring target device named 'if17'.
> 
> It seems that the original code meant to report an error message in this
> case, but it does not, since ll_index_to_name() never returns 0. I would
> not like to bail out in case of an error, since the user would still be
> interested to know what are the other details of the action.
> 
> v2: properly declare the new function ll_index_exsits()

I am okay with the concept but  "missing-if1" is still a possible
but unlikely name for a device.  Maybe better to use something more
obvious like [unknown-1] or UNKNOWN? 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html