lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 07:41:41 +0200 From: Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, bhutchings@...arflare.com Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [net-next.git 3/8 (V2)] stmmac: add the initial tx coalesce schema Hello David, Ben, On 9/14/2012 9:36 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote: > On 9/13/2012 10:23 PM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com> >> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 08:55:09 +0200 >> >>> + unsigned long flags; >>> + >>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->tx_lock, flags); >>> >>> - spin_lock(&priv->tx_lock); >>> + priv->xstats.tx_clean++; >> >> You are changing the locking here for the sake of the new timer. >> >> But timers run in software interrupt context, so this change is >> completely unnecessary since NAPI runs in software interrupt context >> as well, and neither timers nor NAPI run in hardware interrupts >> context. > > Indeed It can be called by the ISR too in this new implementation. > I have added the spin_lock_irqsave/restore otherwise, testing with > CONFIG_PROVE_LOOKING, I get the following warning on ARM SMP. sorry if I disturb you again, any news on these patches? Please, let me know. Regards Peppe > > [ 8.030000] > [ 8.030000] ================================= > [ 8.030000] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] > [ 8.030000] 3.4.7_stm24_0302-b2000+ #103 Not tainted > [ 8.030000] --------------------------------- > [ 8.030000] inconsistent {HARDIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-HARDIRQ-W} usage. > [ 8.030000] swapper/0/1 [HC1[1]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] takes: > [ 8.030000] (&(&priv->tx_lock)->rlock){?.-...}, at: [<802651d8>] > stmmac_tx+0x1c/0x388 > [ 8.030000] {HARDIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: > [ 8.030000] [<800562b4>] __lock_acquire+0x638/0x179c > [ 8.030000] [<80057884>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x74 > [ 8.030000] [<80428a08>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x50 > [ 8.030000] [<802651d8>] stmmac_tx+0x1c/0x388 > [ 8.030000] [<80026be0>] run_timer_softirq+0x180/0x23c > [ 8.030000] [<80020ccc>] __do_softirq+0xa0/0x114 > [ 8.030000] [<80021204>] irq_exit+0x58/0x7c > [ 8.030000] [<8000dc80>] handle_IRQ+0x7c/0xb8 > [ 8.030000] [<80008464>] gic_handle_irq+0x34/0x58 > [ 8.030000] [<80429684>] __irq_svc+0x44/0x78 > [ 8.030000] [<8001c3f4>] vprintk+0x41c/0x480 > [ 8.030000] [<8042097c>] printk+0x18/0x24 > [ 8.030000] [<805aef6c>] prepare_namespace+0x1c/0x1a4 > [ 8.030000] [<805ae980>] kernel_init+0x1c8/0x20c > [ 8.030000] [<8000deb8>] kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8 > [ 8.030000] irq event stamp: 254745 > [ 8.030000] hardirqs last enabled at (254744): [<80429240>] > _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3c/0x6c > [ 8.030000] hardirqs last disabled at (254745): [<80429674>] > __irq_svc+0x34/0x78 > [ 8.030000] softirqs last enabled at (254741): [<8035d964>] > dev_queue_xmit+0x6a4/0x724 > [ 8.030000] softirqs last disabled at (254737): [<8035d2d4>] > dev_queue_xmit+0x14/0x724 > [ 8.030000] > [ 8.030000] other info that might help us debug this: > [ 8.030000] Possible unsafe locking scenario: > [ 8.030000] > [ 8.030000] CPU0 > [ 8.030000] ---- > [ 8.030000] lock(&(&priv->tx_lock)->rlock); > [ 8.030000] <Interrupt> > [ 8.030000] lock(&(&priv->tx_lock)->rlock); > [ 8.030000] > [ 8.030000] *** DEADLOCK *** > >> Therefore, disabling hardware interrupts for this lock is unnecessary >> and will decrease performance. >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists