lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 19 Sep 2012 11:27:07 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>,
	Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
	Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: only run neigh_forced_gc() from one cpu

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

With multiqueue NIC or RPS, we can have situation where all cpus are
spending huge amount of cycles in neigh_forced_gc(), and machine can
crash.

Since we are under probable attack, its better to let only one cpu
do the scan, and other cpus immediately return from neigh_forced_gc()

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
Cc: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
Cc: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
---
Google-Bug-Id: 7121897

 include/net/neighbour.h |    1 +
 net/core/neighbour.c    |    9 +++++++--
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/neighbour.h b/include/net/neighbour.h
index 0dab173..ba21e93 100644
--- a/include/net/neighbour.h
+++ b/include/net/neighbour.h
@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ struct neigh_table {
 	struct neigh_statistics	__percpu *stats;
 	struct neigh_hash_table __rcu *nht;
 	struct pneigh_entry	**phash_buckets;
+	spinlock_t		forced_gc_lock;
 };
 
 #define NEIGH_PRIV_ALIGN	sizeof(long long)
diff --git a/net/core/neighbour.c b/net/core/neighbour.c
index c160adb..1f7d8fa 100644
--- a/net/core/neighbour.c
+++ b/net/core/neighbour.c
@@ -134,9 +134,12 @@ static int neigh_forced_gc(struct neigh_table *tbl)
 	int i;
 	struct neigh_hash_table *nht;
 
+	if (!spin_trylock_bh(&tbl->forced_gc_lock))
+		return 0;
+
 	NEIGH_CACHE_STAT_INC(tbl, forced_gc_runs);
 
-	write_lock_bh(&tbl->lock);
+	write_lock(&tbl->lock);
 	nht = rcu_dereference_protected(tbl->nht,
 					lockdep_is_held(&tbl->lock));
 	for (i = 0; i < (1 << nht->hash_shift); i++) {
@@ -169,7 +172,8 @@ static int neigh_forced_gc(struct neigh_table *tbl)
 
 	tbl->last_flush = jiffies;
 
-	write_unlock_bh(&tbl->lock);
+	write_unlock(&tbl->lock);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&tbl->forced_gc_lock);
 
 	return shrunk;
 }
@@ -1545,6 +1549,7 @@ static void neigh_table_init_no_netlink(struct neigh_table *tbl)
 		panic("cannot allocate neighbour cache hashes");
 
 	rwlock_init(&tbl->lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&tbl->forced_gc_lock);
 	INIT_DELAYED_WORK_DEFERRABLE(&tbl->gc_work, neigh_periodic_work);
 	schedule_delayed_work(&tbl->gc_work, tbl->parms.reachable_time);
 	setup_timer(&tbl->proxy_timer, neigh_proxy_process, (unsigned long)tbl);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ