netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Added information about which firmware file is being requested.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:06:44 +0200
From:	Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
To:	Jarl Friis <jarl@...tace.dk>
Cc:	Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>,
	Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@...imi.it>,
	Gábor Stefanik <netrolller.3d@...il.com>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, b43-dev@...ts.infradead.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Added information about which firmware file is being requested.

2012/9/19 Jarl Friis <jarl@...tace.dk>:
> 2012/9/19 Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>:
>> On 19.09.2012 15:18, Jarl Friis wrote:
>>
>>> +     b43info(ctx->dev->wl, "Requesting firmware file '%s'\n", ctx->fwname);
>>>       err = request_firmware(&blob, ctx->fwname, ctx->dev->dev->dev);
>>
>> Hmm.  I wonder if this should be printed in request_firmware()
>> itself instead of in all callers?
>
> Now that you mention it, I also think that is a much better idea.
> However that would be a much more central place to do the change, so I
> would gladly see somebody else do that patch (in replacement of mine)

I agree, please submit patch modifying request_firmware if you believe
it's important.

-- 
Rafał
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html