| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 22:21:42 +0930 From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Thomas Lendacky <tahm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, avi@...hat.com, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] virtio-net: inline header support Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> writes: > Il 04/10/2012 02:11, Rusty Russell ha scritto: >> > > There's a reason I haven't done this. I really, really dislike "my >> > > implemention isn't broken" feature bits. We could have an infinite >> > > number of them, for each bug in each device. >> > >> > However, this bug affects (almost) all implementations and (almost) all >> > devices. It even makes sense to reserve a transport feature bit for it >> > instead of a device feature bit. >> >> Perhaps, but we have to fix the bugs first! > > Yes. :) Isn't that what mst's patch does? > >> As I said, my torture patch broke qemu immediately. Since noone has >> leapt onto fixing that, I'll take a look now... > > I can look at virtio-scsi. Actually, you can't, see my reply to Anthony... Message-ID: <87lifm1y1n.fsf@...tcorp.com.au> Cheers, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists