[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 17:48:54 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] usbnet: introduce usbnet 3 command helpers
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de> wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 October 2012 16:17:25 Ming Lei wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de> wrote:
>
>> > We need to use GFP_NOIO in situations the helper cannot know about.
>> > Please add a gfp_t parameter. Then the caller will solve that.
>>
>> Considered that most of drivers call the helpers in different context, I think
>> it is better to switch the gpf_t flag runtime inside helpers, like below:
>>
>> if (dev->power.runtime_status == RPM_RESUMING)
>> gfp = GFP_NOIO;
>> else
>> gfp = GFP_KERNEL;
>
> You are admirably persistent ;-)
I am only trying to solve the problem more generally, :-)
> If you extended the check to RPM_SUSPENDING it might work,
> but still the problem with error handling exists.
Could you describe the error handling case in a bit detail so
that callers of these helpers can know when GFP_KERNEL
is to be passed and when GFP_NOIO is taken if the gfp
patamerer has to be added?
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists