netdev - Re: setting flow spec rules under vswitch configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:31:21 +0200
From:	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
CC:	Rony Efraim <ronye@...lanox.com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: setting flow spec rules under vswitch configuration

On 10/10/2012 16:28, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 16:16 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> [...]
>> >Thanks for setting the sketch of a plan here... so if we go little bit
>> >into details, we can safely move 20 bytes from the hadata[60] field into
>> >the beginning of struct ethtool_flow_ext, which will still allow old
>> >user space to work with newer kernels. As for newer uses space that
>> >would like to set mac addresses within
>> >ethtool_flow_ext, how are they supposed to identify if the kernel
>> >supports this extension (of the extension...)?
> Well they can't tell in advance, but we can define another flag in
> flow_type like FLOW_EXT and existing drivers will reject flow specs with
> that flag set.
I understand what we can add a flag which will be rejected by driver's 
that don't support this ext,
can the same/similar flag be used for newer user space code to mark they 
want this ext?

Or.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html