lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 13 Oct 2012 21:45:53 +0800
From:	Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@...cle.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, rds-devel@....oracle.com,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [rds-devel] [patch] RDS: fix an integer overflow check

On 10/13/2012 09:25 PM, Jeff Liu wrote:
> On 10/12/2012 03:31 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> "len" is an int.  We verified that len was postive already.  Since
>> PAGE_SIZE is specified as an unsigned long, the type it promoted to
>> unsigned and the condition is never true.
>>
>> I'm not sure this check is actually needed.  It might be that we could
>> just remove it?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/net/rds/info.c b/net/rds/info.c
>> index 9a6b4f6..4d62618 100644
>> --- a/net/rds/info.c
>> +++ b/net/rds/info.c
>> @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ int rds_info_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int optname, char __user *optval,
>>    
>>    	/* check for all kinds of wrapping and the like */
>>    	start = (unsigned long)optval;
>> -	if (len < 0 || len + PAGE_SIZE - 1 < len || start + len < start) {
> Looks the original thought is to check up len + (PAGE_SIZE - 1) < len to
> avoid integer overflow, but lack of a "()".
>
> However, we only have one add operation in this function which were
> shown as following:
>           nr_pages = (PAGE_ALIGN(start + len) - (start & PAGE_MASK))
>                           >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>
> I also gone through the call chains, there is no other (start + len)
Sorry, here is a typo.  "start + len" is already well-checked.
Actually, I means there is no other "len + (PAGE_SIZE - 1)" operations.

Thanks,
-Jeff
> operations for all transport, I think it's safe to remove this check up
> if so.
>
> Thanks,
> -Jeff
>> +	if (len < 0 || len > INT_MAX - (PAGE_SIZE - 1) || start + len < start) {
>>    		ret = -EINVAL;
>>    		goto out;
>>    	}
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> rds-devel mailing list
> rds-devel@....oracle.com
> https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/rds-devel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ