netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] PCI-Express Non-Transparent Bridge Support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:18:41 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Jon Mason <jon.mason@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
	Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] PCI-Express Non-Transparent Bridge Support

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 06:06:21PM -0700, Jon Mason wrote:
> > > +static inline unsigned int ntb_query_max_cbs(struct ntb_device *ndev)
> > > +{
> > > +	return ndev->max_cbs;
> > > +}
> > 
> > It is shorter, and simpler, to just write the '->variable' version out
> > for this, than to make the function call here.  Why are these needed?
> > Especially when I see the driver code not using them.  Please remove.
> 
> This is used in ntb_transport.c.  It is used to show how many
> interrupts, and there-by clients, the transport layer can have.  I can
> make it a macro and/or put it in a header file, if that suits you
> better.

No, just reference the field of the structure directly, no need for a
function or a macro.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html