netdev - Re: [PATCH] net/macb: increase RX buffer size for GEM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:22:27 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	nicolas.ferre@...el.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, manabian@...il.com,
	plagnioj@...osoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/macb: increase RX buffer size for GEM

From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 13:15:43 +0100

> Macb Ethernet controller requires a RX buffer of 128 bytes. It is
> highly sub-optimal for Gigabit-capable GEM that is able to use
> a bigger DMA buffer. Change this constant and associated macros
> with data stored in the private structure.
> I also kept the result of buffers per page calculation to lower the
> impact of this move to a variable rx buffer size on rx hot path.
> RX DMA buffer size has to be multiple of 64 bytes as indicated in
> DMA Configuration Register specification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>

This looks like it will waste a couple hundred bytes for 1500 MTU
frames, am I right?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html